![]()
|
"In making our determination [whether to deploy a limited National Missile Defense], we will ... review progress in achieving our arms control objectives, including negotiating any amendments to the ABM Treaty that may be required to accommodate a possible NMD deployment."
"The message to Bill Clinton notes, in part, that a collapse of the Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty resulting from the deployment in the United States of systems of territorial anti-missile defense would have extremely dangerous consequences for the entire arms control process."
"Recognizing the historical role of the [Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty] as the cornerstone for maintaining international peace and security and strategic stability, ... [The United Nations General Assembly] calls for renewed efforts by each of the States parties to preserve and strengthen the ABM Treaty through full and strict compliance and, in this context, reiterates that there shall be no deployment of anti-ballistic missile systems for a defence of the territory of its country and no provision of a base for such defence ..."
"We note that the resolution ... got the support of a wide range of states, including France, India, Mexico, Ireland, Indonesia, the Republic of South Africa and Egypt. In this connection we would like to emphasize again that ... the implementation of the ABM treaty ... affects the foundations of the security of virtually all countries."
"We must avoid any questioning of the ABM treaty that could lead to disruption of strategic equilibria and a new nuclear arms race."
"There is no doubt that [US deployment of a national missile defense system] would lead to split security standards within the NATO alliance."
"Even British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who is probably Clinton's closest ally among world leaders, is said to harbor serious reservations about US plans for ballistic missile defense." -- Washington Post, November 6, 1999
Also available on this website: Nuclear Defense and Offense: An Analysis of US Policy |
Science for Democratic
Action vol. 8 no. 2 Main Menu
Science for Democratic Action
Main Menu
IEER Home Page
Institute for Energy and
Environmental ResearchFebruary 2000