IEER
Science for Democratic Action Vol. 5 No. 2
|
Information on DARHT Information on NIF The fundamental rationale the DOE gives the public for the SBSS program is to assure the safety and reliability of the nuclear arsenal as it ages. However, as our main article points out, there has not been a single aging-related safety problem in the U.S. nuclear arsenal that affected the nuclear components of a warhead (the "physics package"). (See table below.) Moreover, the SBSS facilities being maintained and constructed by the DOE appear to contribute more to weapons design or modification than they do to assuring the safety of the arsenal. This centerfold discusses the facilities proposed for the SBSS program, focusing primarily on two key facilities: the Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, and the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California. While the DOE asserts these facilities are necessary to assure warhead safety, they are the same types of facilities used by the DOE in the past for weapons design. DARHT is a hydrodynamic facility, which helps weapons designers determine the physical behavior of uranium and plutonium under the extreme temperature and pressure conditions that prevail during detonation. The term "hydrodynamic" is used to describe such testing because materials tend to behave like liquids under these conditions. Hydrodynamic tests are among the most realistic of non-nuclear tests, because they can be used to study a warhead up to the point that it would achieve criticality (a self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction). NIF is a high energy density facility, which can be used to study thermonuclear (fusion) reactions that take place in the secondaries of nuclear warheads, and during the boosting phase of a detonation.1 "Ignition" refers to the burning of a pellet of deuterium and tritium after exposure to high energy lasers. High energy density facilities must conduct these experiments at much lower total volumes than would take place in a detonation, requiring that the results be scaled to the volume of actual warheads in order to apply them to improve safety or reliability.
|
| ||||
| B28 | Parachute System | Retired | ||
| W40 | Arm/Safe/Fire | Retired. Problem affected both safety and reliability | ||
| B43 | Parachute System | Retired | ||
| B43 | Structure/Assembly | Retired | ||
| W58 | Structure/Assembly | Retired | ||
| B61 (CHE)2 | Radar | Retired. Problem affected both safety and reliability | ||
| B61 (IHE)3 | Parachute System | Active. The eleventh modification of this warhead is due to be completed in 1997 | ||
| W87 | Gas Transfer System | Active. Problem affected both safety and reliability and was the result of both aging and a design problem | ||
|
The Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Testing Facility (DARHT)
The Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Testing facility would be used by the DOE to study the behavior of warhead primaries during detonation. "Dual-Axis" refers to two very large X-ray machines which are used to take "radiographs" (X-ray photographs) of the implosion of a mock-up nuclear warhead pit. The materials tested can be depleted uranium or plutonium-242, a non-fissile isotope of plutonium. As discussed above, "hydrodynamic" refers to the fact that under the extreme pressure and temperature conditions of implosion, these materials take on the qualities of liquids, and therefore their physical behavior can be modeled by equations which apply to liquids. Like all hydrodynamic facilities, DARHT can be used for new weapons design. According to its proponents, the two main improvements of DARHT over other hydrodynamic testing facilities (see table of other facilities) are the increased resolution of radiographic images, and the use of two axes instead of one. The second axis allows for three-dimensional observation of the compressed materials simulating the pit of a warhead. However, Seymour Sack, a Laboratory Associate at Livermore, argues that the information that DARHT is designed to provide can be gleaned through small-scale experiments at existing or upgraded facilities. The DOE plans to use the information gained from hydrodynamic and dynamic experiments to validate or refine the computer codes used to model warheads. According to the DOE, the computer models would be used to predict possible problems with primaries, or as one test of whether a corrective action would work. (However, new codes based on data from SBSS facilities will be less accurate when applied to existing warheads and could adversely affect safety and reliability.) Hydrodynamic testing could also be used to certify certain weapons components after re-manufacture or design. The total estimated cost of the new DARHT facility is $123.8 million.
The National Ignition Facility (NIF) Considered one of the cornerstones of the SBSS program, the National Ignition Facility would use lasers to produce X-rays to study fusion at low volumes. The process involves Inertial Confinement Fusion experiments in which powerful lasers are used to superheat a minute capsule of deuterium and tritium to the point of ignition, resulting in a self-sustaining thermonuclear burn -- a tiny thermonuclear explosion. Since NIF is expected to be able to operate at energy densities similar to the level of a nuclear explosion, it can be used to study the thermonuclear phenomena that occur in nuclear warheads during detonation. This would allow weapons designers to gain information on new weapons design concepts without nuclear weapons testing, though it would not contribute significantly to understanding the types of problems that have historically affected the secondaries of warheads. Even at the high densities possible through NIF, the total energy released in the experiments is from 10,000 to a billion times less than that of a nuclear weapons test and must be appropriately scaled to be useful in accurately assessing the operation of existing warheads. NIF can only examine isolated fusion phenomena and is incapable of exactly simulating the complex interplay of a variety of fission, fusion, and non-nuclear physical processes that occur in a nuclear explosion. It would therefore be irrelevant to studying or assuring the nuclear safety of existing warheads, but would enable advances in the design of new ones. Proponents claim that NIF would be relevant to studying reliability. However, IEER has tentatively concluded that DOE's definition of reliability seems to relate mainly to first strike capability rather than maintaining retaliatory deterrence. The National Ignition Facility is estimated to cost about $1 billion.
|
Institute for Energy and Environmental Research
Comments to Outreach Coordinator: ieer@ieer.org
Takoma Park, Maryland, USA
December, 1997
|